VPU vs. VYM
VPU (Vanguard Utilities ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VPU returned 9.30%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for VYM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VPU vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPU achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VPU has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 9.30%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.
VPU
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
VYM
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 24.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
VPU vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 8.52% | 16.46% | 23.04% | -7.45% | 1.06% | 17.40% | -0.74% | 24.89% | 4.38% | 12.44% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.09% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPU and VYM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VPU and VYM has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VPU vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPU
VYM
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
VPU
VYM
Energy
VPU
VYM
Industrials
VPU
VYM
Basic Materials
VPU
-
VYM
Communication Services
VPU
-
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VPU
-
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VPU
-
VYM
Financial Services
VPU
-
VYM
Healthcare
VPU
-
VYM
Real Estate
VPU
-
VYM
Technology
VPU
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPU vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VPU
VYM
VPU vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VPU | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 3.66 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 13.57 | -9.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VPU vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPU drawdown since its inception was -46.31%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPU and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPU | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.31% | -56.98% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -6.69% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.34% | -14.46% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -15.84% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.42% | -35.21% | -1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -0.77% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.17% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 1.80% | +2.38% |
Volatility
VPU vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.95%. This indicates that VPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPU | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 2.95% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 7.64% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 10.36% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 13.93% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 16.31% | +2.83% |
VPU vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VPU vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than VYM's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 3.23% | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 3.17% | 2.83% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.63% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.28% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPU and VYM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPU has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to VYM (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPU dropped -46.31% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.19% vs 9.30% for VPU. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VPU.
VPU has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.28% for VYM.
VPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VPU and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPU and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer