PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPU vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPU vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPU achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 5.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VPU has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.73%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.30% annualized return.


VPU

1D
0.01%
1M
0.81%
6M
5.41%
YTD
6.36%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
8.73%
ALL TIME*
9.80%

SCHG

1D
0.35%
1M
1.19%
6M
8.73%
YTD
5.30%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
18.30%
ALL TIME*
16.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPU vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
6.36%16.46%23.04%-7.45%1.06%17.40%-0.74%24.89%4.38%12.44%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
5.30%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VPU and SCHG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between VPU and SCHG has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VPU vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPU
SCHG

Utilities

98.8%
0.5%

Energy

0.4%
0.9%

Industrials

0.4%
7.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.9%

Financial Services

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

9.9%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

44.0%

Utilities

VPU
98.8%
SCHG
0.5%

Energy

VPU
0.4%
SCHG
0.9%

Industrials

VPU
0.4%
SCHG
7.6%

Basic Materials

VPU

-

SCHG
1.6%

Communication Services

VPU

-

SCHG
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VPU

-

SCHG
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

VPU

-

SCHG
1.9%

Financial Services

VPU

-

SCHG
7.7%

Healthcare

VPU

-

SCHG
9.9%

Real Estate

VPU

-

SCHG
0.6%

Technology

VPU

-

SCHG
44.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPU vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPU
VPU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPU vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPUSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

0.94

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

3.01

-0.69

VPU vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPU and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPU vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPU drawdown since its inception was -46.31%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPU and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPUSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.31%

-34.59%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-16.41%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.34%

-23.39%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-34.59%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

-34.59%

-1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-2.82%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-5.19%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

5.12%

-0.85%

Volatility

VPU vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPUSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.30%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

12.82%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

16.40%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

22.40%

-5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

21.57%

-2.42%

VPU vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VPU vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
2.66%2.73%3.02%3.49%2.98%2.70%3.17%2.83%3.23%3.18%3.19%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPU and SCHG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to VPU (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPU dropped -46.31% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.30% vs 8.73% for VPU. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VPU has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.30% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VPU.

VPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

VPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VPU and 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPU and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer