PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPL vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPL vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPL achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, VPL has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 10.76%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


VPL

1D
-5.86%
1M
1.56%
YTD
25.73%
6M
25.83%
1Y
47.86%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
10.76%

VIG

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.48%
YTD
6.98%
6M
6.28%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPL vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
25.73%32.66%1.68%15.58%-15.20%1.10%16.65%18.16%-14.40%28.85%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.98%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VPL and VIG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006

0.73

The correlation between VPL and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VPL vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPL
VIG

Technology

22.6%
29.0%

Industrials

20.5%
11.3%

Financial Services

19.3%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
4.4%

Basic Materials

7.3%
3.3%

Healthcare

5.0%
16.6%

Communication Services

4.8%
0.5%

Real Estate

4.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
9.3%

Energy

1.6%
3.2%

Utilities

1.6%
2.9%

Technology

VPL
22.6%
VIG
29.0%

Industrials

VPL
20.5%
VIG
11.3%

Financial Services

VPL
19.3%
VIG
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VPL
9.6%
VIG
4.4%

Basic Materials

VPL
7.3%
VIG
3.3%

Healthcare

VPL
5.0%
VIG
16.6%

Communication Services

VPL
4.8%
VIG
0.5%

Real Estate

VPL
4.3%
VIG

-

Consumer Defensive

VPL
3.5%
VIG
9.3%

Energy

VPL
1.6%
VIG
3.2%

Utilities

VPL
1.6%
VIG
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPL vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPL
VPL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPL vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPLVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.34

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

9.44

+4.28

VPL vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPL and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPL vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPL drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPL and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPLVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-46.81%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.33%

-7.91%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-14.95%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.09%

-20.39%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-31.72%

-2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.86%

-1.13%

-4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-5.50%

-6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.96%

+1.54%

Volatility

VPL vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.89%. This indicates that VPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPLVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.91%

2.89%

+9.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.95%

7.70%

+12.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.25%

10.14%

+12.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

14.23%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

16.04%

+1.48%

VPL vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VPL vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

VPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
2.66%4.01%3.15%3.12%2.75%3.19%1.81%2.84%3.06%2.57%2.65%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPL and VIG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPL has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to VIG (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPL dropped -55.49% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.34% vs 10.76% for VPL. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VPL.

VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

VPL is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VIG is Dividend. VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VPL and 0.04% for VIG.

VPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPL and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer