VPL vs. VXUS
VPL (Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPL is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VPL returned 10.87%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VPL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
VPL vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPL achieves a 30.65% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VPL has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 10.87%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.
VPL
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- 30.65%
- 6M
- 33.92%
- 1Y
- 52.92%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 18.56%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
VPL vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 30.65% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -14.40% | 28.85% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 15.39% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPL and VXUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between VPL and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
VPL vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPL
VXUS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VPL
VXUS
Industrials
VPL
VXUS
Financial Services
VPL
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
VPL
VXUS
Basic Materials
VPL
VXUS
Healthcare
VPL
VXUS
Communication Services
VPL
VXUS
Real Estate
VPL
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
VPL
VXUS
Energy
VPL
VXUS
Utilities
VPL
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPL vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
VPL
VXUS
VPL vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 2.16 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 2.96 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.40 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.02 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 11.82 | +4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.16 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.56 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.39 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
VPL vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPL drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPL and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -35.97% | -19.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -11.27% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -13.58% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.09% | -29.44% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -35.97% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -8.22% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.88% | +0.49% |
Volatility
VPL vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.57%. This indicates that VPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 5.57% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.71% | 12.97% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.58% | 15.19% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 16.04% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 17.16% | +0.14% |
VPL vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VPL vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
VPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than VXUS's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 2.72% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.63% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VPL and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VPL has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to VXUS (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPL dropped -55.49% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, VPL leads with 10.87% vs 9.86% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VPL has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 9.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VPL.
VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.63% for VXUS.
VPL is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VPL and 0.05% for VXUS.
VPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPL and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer