VPC vs. AMZA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index, while AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. VPC is passively managed, while AMZA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VPC returned 0.39%/yr vs 19.14%/yr for AMZA. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VPC charges 0.75%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.

Performance

VPC vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPC achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 22.69% return.

VPC

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -3.76%
• YTD: -12.79%
• 6M: -11.42%
• 1Y: -15.79%
• 3Y*: 1.19%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: —

AMZA

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: 22.69%
• 6M: 22.31%
• 1Y: 19.14%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 19.14%
• 10Y*: 5.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPC vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF	-12.79%	-6.75%	10.52%	22.20%	-11.70%	34.18%	-9.50%	9.25%
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	22.69%	0.17%	30.90%	23.35%	33.20%	51.22%	-49.25%	-8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VPC and AMZA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between VPC and AMZA has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VPC vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPC

VPC Risk / Return Rank: 2
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

AMZA

AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 30
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPC vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VPC	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.18	1.08	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	1.59	-3.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.19	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	1.58	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	3.87	-5.17

VPC vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPC Sharpe Ratio is -1.18, which is lower than the AMZA Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPC and AMZA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VPC vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPC and AMZA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VPC	AMZA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.45%	-91.46%	+38.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.76%	-12.16%	-10.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.86%	-18.56%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	-25.15%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.76%	-9.84%	-12.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.76%	-44.85%	+37.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.20%	4.95%	+7.25%

Volatility

VPC vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) is 4.19%, while InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that VPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VPC	AMZA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	5.85%	-1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.26%	13.53%	-2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.50%	17.92%	-4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.56%	25.67%	-12.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.52%	37.20%	-16.68%

VPC vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

VPC vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.70%, more than AMZA's 8.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	8.16%	8.81%	7.29%	9.40%	7.65%	10.24%	22.13%	19.47%	34.46%	24.16%	18.36%	18.21%
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF	16.70%	14.33%	11.26%	11.71%	10.74%	6.31%	10.06%	8.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VPC and AMZA in my portfolio?

VPC and AMZA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VPC or AMZA?

AMZA has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to VPC (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPC dropped -53.45% vs AMZA's -91.46%.

Which ETF is better, VPC or AMZA?

On 5-year performance, AMZA leads with 19.14% vs 0.39% for VPC. On fees, VPC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VPC or AMZA?

Over the 5-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VPC or AMZA?

VPC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VPC or AMZA?

VPC has the higher dividend yield at 16.70%, compared with 8.16% for AMZA.

What is the main difference between VPC and AMZA?

VPC is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while AMZA is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPC and 2.01% for AMZA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.