VPC vs. SCHG
VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VPC returned 0.37%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VPC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
VPC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPC achieves a -13.15% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 2.76% return.
VPC
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- -13.15%
- 6M
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- -16.89%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 20.89%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
VPC vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | -13.15% | -6.75% | 10.52% | 22.20% | -11.70% | 34.18% | -9.50% | 9.25% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.76% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 24.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPC and SCHG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPC vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
VPC
SCHG
VPC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VPC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.23 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.28 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 4.19 | -5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VPC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPC and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.45% | -34.59% | -18.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.76% | -16.41% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.86% | -23.39% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -34.59% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.08% | -5.16% | -17.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -5.20% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.13% | 5.00% | +7.13% |
Volatility
VPC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) is 4.15%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that VPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.78% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 12.50% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 16.21% | -2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 22.37% | -8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 21.61% | -1.09% |
VPC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
VPC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.77%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | 16.77% | 14.33% | 11.26% | 11.71% | 10.74% | 6.31% | 10.06% | 8.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPC and SCHG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to VPC (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPC dropped -53.45% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.68% vs 0.37% for VPC. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.68% return vs 0.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VPC.
VPC has the higher dividend yield at 16.77%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
VPC is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VPC tracks Indxx Private Credit Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPC and 0.04% for SCHG.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPC and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer