PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOTE vs. QUAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOTE vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOTE achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly higher than QUAL's 9.65% return.


VOTE

1D
0.44%
1M
4.81%
YTD
11.51%
6M
11.46%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
10Y*

QUAL

1D
0.79%
1M
4.74%
YTD
9.65%
6M
9.63%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
14.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOTE vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
11.51%17.95%25.23%27.60%-19.74%12.08%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
9.65%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%12.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VOTE and QUAL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.96

The correlation between VOTE and QUAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOTE vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOTE
QUAL

Technology

35.5%
36.5%

Financial Services

11.7%
11.5%

Communication Services

11.3%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.0%

Industrials

8.5%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.6%
4.0%

Utilities

2.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

VOTE
35.5%
QUAL
36.5%

Financial Services

VOTE
11.7%
QUAL
11.5%

Communication Services

VOTE
11.3%
QUAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VOTE
10.2%
QUAL
9.3%

Healthcare

VOTE
8.6%
QUAL
9.0%

Industrials

VOTE
8.5%
QUAL
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

VOTE
4.8%
QUAL
4.9%

Energy

VOTE
3.6%
QUAL
4.0%

Utilities

VOTE
2.3%
QUAL
1.9%

Basic Materials

VOTE
1.8%
QUAL
1.7%

Real Estate

VOTE
1.8%
QUAL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOTE vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOTE vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOTEQUALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.47

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

11.25

+3.25

VOTE vs. QUAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the QUAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOTE and QUAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOTEQUALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.88

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.80

0.00

Drawdowns

VOTE vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOTE drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOTE and QUAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTEQUALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-34.06%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.03%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-18.00%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

0.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-4.10%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.98%

0.00%

Volatility

VOTE vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 2.54%. This indicates that VOTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTEQUALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.54%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

9.06%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

11.84%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

17.33%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.09%

-0.95%

VOTE vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOTE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOTE vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than QUAL's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.87%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
0.89%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VOTE and QUAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOTE has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to QUAL (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOTE dropped -25.71% vs QUAL's -34.06%.

On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 23.05% vs 20.16% for QUAL. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 23.05% return vs 20.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.

VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.

VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Engine No. 1 LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOTE and 0.15% for QUAL.

VOTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOTE and QUAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer