VOTE vs. AIFD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

VOTE (TCW Transform 500 ETF) and AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOTE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while AIFD is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by TCW. VOTE is passively managed, while AIFD is actively managed. Over the past year, VOTE returned 21.16% vs 55.82% for AIFD. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VOTE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIFD.

Performance

VOTE vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOTE achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 30.44% return.

VOTE

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -0.05%
• 6M: 8.71%
• YTD: 10.03%
• 1Y: 21.16%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.94%

AIFD

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: -5.02%
• 6M: 27.69%
• YTD: 30.44%
• 1Y: 55.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	$710.64K	$728.72K	$1.19M
VOTE TCW Transform 500 ETF	$1.77M	$1.64M	$2.40M

VOTE vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VOTE TCW Transform 500 ETF	10.03%	17.95%	16.02%
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	30.44%	28.30%	15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VOTE and AIFD is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024	0.83

The correlation between VOTE and AIFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOTE vs. AIFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOTE	AIFD
Technology	38.5%	73.7%
Financial Services	11.5%	-
Communication Services	9.8%	7.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	5.2%
Healthcare	9.0%	-
Industrials	8.8%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

VOTE vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOTE

VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 64
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

AIFD

AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 73
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOTE vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOTE	AIFD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.73	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.24	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.28	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	2.60	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.96	10.64	-1.67

VOTE vs. AIFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the AIFD Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOTE and AIFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOTE vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOTE drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum AIFD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOTE and AIFD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOTE	AIFD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.71%	-33.20%	+7.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-20.22%	+11.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-14.44%	+12.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-5.98%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	4.93%	-2.78%

Volatility

VOTE vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) is 3.59%, while TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) has a volatility of 11.69%. This indicates that VOTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOTE	AIFD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	11.69%	-8.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.29%	25.06%	-14.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	30.35%	-17.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	30.57%	-13.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	30.57%	-13.49%

VOTE vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOTE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOTE vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison

VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOTE TCW Transform 500 ETF	0.94%	1.03%	1.18%	1.33%	1.54%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOTE and AIFD in my portfolio?

VOTE and AIFD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOTE or AIFD?

AIFD has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to VOTE (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOTE dropped -25.71% vs AIFD's -33.20%.

Which ETF is better, VOTE or AIFD?

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 55.82% vs 21.16% for VOTE. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOTE or AIFD?

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 55.82% return vs 21.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOTE or AIFD?

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOTE or AIFD?

VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

What is the main difference between VOTE and AIFD?

VOTE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AIFD is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOTE and 0.75% for AIFD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.