VOT vs. ILCG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOT returned 11.95%/yr vs 17.83%/yr for ILCG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.

Performance

VOT vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 11.95%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.83% annualized return.

VOT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 6M: 3.73%
• 1Y: 7.75%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 11.95%

ILCG

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 24.11%
• 3Y*: 25.09%
• 5Y*: 14.03%
• 10Y*: 17.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	5.49%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-5.56%	21.80%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	10.48%	16.71%	32.82%	40.41%	-31.75%	24.33%	38.56%	33.22%	2.06%	30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and ILCG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006	0.90

The correlation between VOT and ILCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOT vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOT	ILCG
Technology	28.9%	49.8%
Industrials	23.7%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.9%	10.6%
Healthcare	9.3%	5.3%
Financial Services	6.8%	6.0%
Real Estate	4.8%	1.4%
Communication Services	3.8%	14.5%
Utilities	3.5%	0.8%
Energy	2.7%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	1.6%

Return for Risk

VOT vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 17
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 41
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VOT	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.44	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.94	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.26	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	1.55	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.46	5.43	-3.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VOT vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VOT	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	1.44	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.64	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.83	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.58	-0.13

Drawdowns

VOT vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than ILCG's maximum drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and ILCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOT	ILCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.16%	-52.98%	-7.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.96%	-15.65%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.77%	-23.10%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.19%	-35.38%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.19%	-35.38%	-1.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.48%	-4.48%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.96%	-8.22%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.33%	4.45%	+0.88%

Volatility

VOT vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is 5.45%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that VOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOT	ILCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	6.01%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	13.55%	-0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.20%	16.85%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.41%	22.08%	-0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	21.58%	-0.56%

VOT vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VOT vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.42%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOT and ILCG in my portfolio?

VOT and ILCG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOT or ILCG?

ILCG has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to VOT (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

Which ETF is better, VOT or ILCG?

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 17.83% vs 11.95% for VOT. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOT or ILCG?

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOT or ILCG?

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOT or ILCG?

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

What is the main difference between VOT and ILCG?

VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ILCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.04% for ILCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.