PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOT vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOT vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.


VOT

1D
0.12%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.49%
6M
3.73%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
11.95%

GLDM

1D
0.25%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.30%
6M
3.19%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
5.49%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-10.90%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.30%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and GLDM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.10

VOT vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOT
GLDM

Technology

28.9%

-

Industrials

23.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Financial Services

6.8%

-

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Communication Services

3.8%

-

Utilities

3.5%

-

Energy

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Technology

VOT
28.9%
GLDM

-

Industrials

VOT
23.7%
GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOT
13.9%
GLDM

-

Healthcare

VOT
9.3%
GLDM

-

Financial Services

VOT
6.8%
GLDM

-

Real Estate

VOT
4.8%
GLDM

-

Communication Services

VOT
3.8%
GLDM

-

Utilities

VOT
3.5%
GLDM

-

Energy

VOT
2.7%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

VOT
1.8%
GLDM
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

VOT
0.8%
GLDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOT vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOTGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.53

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

3.85

-2.39

VOT vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOTGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.15

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

1.00

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.99

-0.54

Drawdowns

VOT vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.16%

-21.63%

-38.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-20.00%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

-20.00%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-20.92%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-19.80%

+16.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-6.24%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

7.96%

-2.63%

Volatility

VOT vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

5.65%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

23.31%

-10.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

26.65%

-10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

17.98%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

16.89%

+4.13%

VOT vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOT vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.63%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOT and GLDM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to VOT (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 6.19% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GLDM is Gold. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.10% for GLDM.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOT and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer