VOT vs. FSMD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOT returned 6.13%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for FSMD. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FSMD.

Performance

VOT vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 17.58% return.

VOT

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: 14.66%
• 5Y*: 6.13%
• 10Y*: 12.19%

FSMD

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 4.76%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: 15.58%
• 1Y: 27.73%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	6.67%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	14.67%
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	17.58%	8.70%	15.18%	17.37%	-11.15%	26.40%	8.94%	8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and FSMD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019	0.82

The correlation between VOT and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOT vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOT	FSMD
Technology	28.9%	18.2%
Industrials	23.7%	20.7%
Consumer Cyclical	13.9%	11.1%
Healthcare	9.3%	11.6%
Financial Services	6.8%	15.4%
Real Estate	4.8%	6.2%
Communication Services	3.8%	2.8%
Utilities	3.5%	2.2%
Energy	2.7%	4.6%
Basic Materials	1.8%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	3.3%

Return for Risk

VOT vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 19
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 18
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FSMD

FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 66
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOT	FSMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.78	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	2.58	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.31	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	3.30	-2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.77	11.89	-10.12

VOT vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOT vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and FSMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOT	FSMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.16%	-40.67%	-19.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.96%	-8.44%	-7.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.77%	-22.16%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.19%	-22.16%	-15.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	0.00%	-2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.95%	-5.98%	-3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.35%	2.34%	+3.01%

Volatility

VOT vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 5.14%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOT	FSMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.42%	5.14%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.32%	11.85%	+1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.56%	15.69%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.46%	18.55%	+2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	21.43%	-0.40%

VOT vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOT vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than FSMD's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.29%	1.37%	1.54%	1.18%	1.32%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOT and FSMD in my portfolio?

VOT and FSMD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOT or FSMD?

VOT has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to FSMD (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

Which ETF is better, VOT or FSMD?

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.00% vs 6.13% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOT or FSMD?

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOT or FSMD?

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOT or FSMD?

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.62% for VOT.

What is the main difference between VOT and FSMD?

VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FSMD is Small Cap Growth Equities. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.29% for FSMD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.