VOT vs. EWMC

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and EWMC (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while EWMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOT returned 11.56%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for EWMC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EWMC.

Performance

VOT vs. EWMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than EWMC's 11.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOT having a 11.56% annualized return and EWMC not far behind at 11.10%.

VOT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -2.49%
• 6M: 3.13%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 1Y: 3.00%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: 5.47%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

EWMC

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.99%
• 6M: 8.43%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 1Y: 18.68%
• 3Y*: 13.27%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: 11.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. EWMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	5.42%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-5.56%	21.80%
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF	11.12%	7.81%	15.67%	18.79%	-11.63%	26.35%	15.60%	23.05%	-12.45%	13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and EWMC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010	0.82

The correlation between VOT and EWMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOT vs. EWMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOT	EWMC
Technology	32.5%	13.3%
Industrials	23.2%	17.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	16.0%
Healthcare	8.9%	9.8%
Financial Services	6.9%	13.8%
Real Estate	4.5%	7.8%
Communication Services	3.6%	2.0%
Utilities	3.2%	3.4%
Energy	1.9%	5.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	5.0%

Return for Risk

VOT vs. EWMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 12
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

EWMC

EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 49
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. EWMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOT	EWMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	1.19	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	1.80	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.21	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	2.46	-2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	7.22	-6.66

VOT vs. EWMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the EWMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and EWMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOT vs. EWMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than EWMC's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and EWMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOT	EWMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.16%	-43.12%	-17.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.96%	-7.62%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.77%	-28.09%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.19%	-28.09%	-9.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.19%	-43.12%	+5.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-0.48%	-3.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-5.67%	-4.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.37%	2.59%	+2.78%

Volatility

VOT vs. EWMC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) at 3.67%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOT	EWMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	3.67%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	10.52%	+3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.07%	15.79%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.56%	20.83%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.01%	22.17%	-1.16%

VOT vs. EWMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EWMC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOT vs. EWMC - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than EWMC's 0.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF	0.71%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOT and EWMC in my portfolio?

VOT and EWMC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOT or EWMC?

VOT has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to EWMC (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs EWMC's -43.12%.

Which ETF is better, VOT or EWMC?

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 11.56% vs 11.10% for EWMC. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOT or EWMC?

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOT or EWMC?

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOT or EWMC?

EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.62% for VOT.

What is the main difference between VOT and EWMC?

VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while EWMC is Small Cap Blend Equities. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.35% for EWMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.