PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 11.33%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.


EWMC

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.06%
6M
11.71%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.33%
ALL TIME*
11.48%

XMMO

1D
0.22%
1M
-5.42%
6M
10.34%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
20.56%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
18.04%
ALL TIME*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43M$1.18M$1.33M
$60.32M$71.93M$66.65M

EWMC vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
13.17%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
11.79%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and XMMO is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between EWMC and XMMO has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWMC vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
XMMO

Industrials

17.9%
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
5.0%

Financial Services

13.8%
2.9%

Technology

13.3%
12.9%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.1%

Real Estate

7.8%
7.2%

Basic Materials

5.9%
10.2%

Energy

5.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
0.5%

Utilities

3.4%
6.0%

Communication Services

2.0%
1.7%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
XMMO
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
XMMO
5.0%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
XMMO
2.9%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
XMMO
12.9%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
XMMO
8.1%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
XMMO
7.2%

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
XMMO
10.2%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
XMMO
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
XMMO
0.5%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
XMMO
6.0%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
XMMO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWMC vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWMCXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.17

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.38

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

5.81

+1.86

EWMC vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-55.37%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-13.91%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-24.93%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-27.91%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-36.74%

-6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-11.24%

+10.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-9.42%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.29%

-0.73%

Volatility

EWMC vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) is 4.04%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

7.88%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

18.46%

-7.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

21.50%

-5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

21.86%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

22.43%

-0.24%

EWMC vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWMC and XMMO have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

EWMC vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than XMMO's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.70%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.63%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and XMMO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to EWMC (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 18.04% vs 11.33% for EWMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWMC and XMMO have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.63% for XMMO.

EWMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index.

EWMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer