PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 10.99%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


EWMC

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.30%
YTD
7.11%
6M
6.51%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.99%

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
7.11%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and XMMO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.82

The correlation between EWMC and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWMC vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
XMMO

Industrials

17.9%
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

13.8%
2.4%

Technology

13.3%
16.7%

Healthcare

9.8%
6.3%

Real Estate

7.8%
6.1%

Basic Materials

5.9%
7.2%

Energy

5.1%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
0.5%

Utilities

3.4%
5.8%

Communication Services

2.0%
1.6%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
XMMO
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
XMMO
4.6%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
XMMO
2.4%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
XMMO
16.7%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
XMMO
6.3%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
XMMO
6.1%

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
XMMO
7.2%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
XMMO
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
XMMO
0.5%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
XMMO
5.8%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
XMMO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWMCXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

4.45

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

18.21

-9.67

EWMC vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWMCXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.99

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.78

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.89

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.58

-0.03

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-55.37%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-8.34%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-24.93%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-27.91%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-36.74%

-6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-9.45%

+3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.04%

+0.53%

Volatility

EWMC vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) is 3.82%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

7.82%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

15.54%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

18.71%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

21.45%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

22.27%

-0.02%

EWMC vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWMC and XMMO have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

EWMC vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.96%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and XMMO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to EWMC (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 10.99% for EWMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWMC and XMMO have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

EWMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer