PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 18.15%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.44%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.15%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.78%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and VYM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between VOOG and VYM has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOOG vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
VYM

Technology

49.4%
17.7%

Communication Services

18.0%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
6.7%

Financial Services

8.8%
20.5%

Industrials

6.2%
12.1%

Healthcare

5.8%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
8.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.0%

Utilities

0.4%
5.7%

Basic Materials

0.4%
3.5%

Energy

0.1%
9.8%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
VYM
17.7%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
VYM
6.7%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
VYM
20.5%

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
VYM
12.1%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
VYM
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
VYM
8.1%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
VYM
0.0%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
VYM
5.7%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
VYM
3.5%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
VYM
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOGVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.93

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

14.76

-4.44

VOOG vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOGVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.56

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.83

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.73

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.51

+0.40

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-56.98%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-6.69%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-14.46%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-15.84%

-16.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-35.21%

+2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.43%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-7.19%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

1.78%

+1.53%

Volatility

VOOG vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

2.77%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

7.67%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

10.28%

+5.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

13.96%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

16.34%

+4.39%

VOOG vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOG vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and VYM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 18.15% vs 11.90% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOG.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while VYM is Dividend. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer