PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 16.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 17.86%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.39% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.61%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
17.86%

FDL

1D
0.91%
1M
3.46%
YTD
16.26%
6M
16.15%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.67%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
16.26%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and FDL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.57

The correlation between VOOG and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOOG vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
FDL

Technology

49.4%
1.1%

Communication Services

18.0%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.8%

Financial Services

8.8%
15.1%

Industrials

6.2%
3.8%

Healthcare

5.8%
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
14.7%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.4%
6.5%

Basic Materials

0.4%
0.3%

Energy

0.1%
27.3%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
FDL
1.1%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
FDL
3.8%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
FDL
15.1%

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
FDL
3.8%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
FDL
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
FDL
14.7%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
FDL

-

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
FDL
6.5%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
FDL
0.3%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
FDL
27.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

5.85

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

14.28

-6.17

VOOG vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-65.93%

+33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-4.27%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-12.24%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-16.46%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-41.40%

+8.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

0.00%

-4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-9.64%

+4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.76%

+1.64%

Volatility

VOOG vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.70%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

2.70%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

7.69%

+5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

11.25%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

14.31%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

17.11%

+3.67%

VOOG vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOOG vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and FDL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to FDL (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 11.39% for FDL. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer