PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 0.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOO having a 15.50% annualized return and WM not far behind at 15.36%.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
0.37%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

WM

1D
0.30%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.71%
6M
2.63%
1Y
-5.72%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
0.71%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%43.82%5.46%30.45%5.32%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and WM is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.48

The correlation between VOO and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.96

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.36

+3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

-0.79

+13.22

VOO vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-77.85%

+43.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-16.70%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-18.14%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-18.14%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-30.07%

-3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-10.24%

+7.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-17.69%

+14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

7.58%

-5.61%

Volatility

VOO vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.13%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

14.08%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

19.03%

-6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

18.62%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

19.54%

-1.51%

Dividends

VOO vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than WM's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.61%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and WM have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WM has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs WM's -77.85%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer