PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.23%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.


VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%

SMH

1D
-9.22%
1M
3.63%
YTD
58.19%
6M
56.81%
1Y
127.40%
3Y*
58.39%
5Y*
36.10%
10Y*
36.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
58.19%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and SMH is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.77

The correlation between VOO and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
SMH

Technology

35.7%
100.0%

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VOO
35.7%
SMH
100.0%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
SMH

-

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
SMH

-

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
SMH

-

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
SMH

-

Energy

VOO
3.5%
SMH

-

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
SMH

-

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.59

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

8.58

-5.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

32.42

-18.89

VOO vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

4.00

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.03

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.11

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.32

+0.55

Drawdowns

VOO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-84.96%

+50.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-14.93%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-35.74%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-45.30%

+20.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-45.30%

+11.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-10.69%

+7.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-41.08%

+37.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.94%

-2.02%

Volatility

VOO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.74%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

14.88%

-11.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

26.35%

-17.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

32.03%

-19.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

35.24%

-18.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

32.70%

-14.68%

VOO vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.19%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and SMH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to VOO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.02% vs 15.23% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.02% return vs 15.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while SMH is Semiconductors. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer