VOO vs. RODM
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for RODM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
VOO vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 15.50%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.30% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
RODM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
VOO vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 12.24% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and RODM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VOO and RODM shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOO vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
RODM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
RODM
Financial Services
VOO
RODM
Communication Services
VOO
RODM
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
RODM
Healthcare
VOO
RODM
Industrials
VOO
RODM
Consumer Defensive
VOO
RODM
Energy
VOO
RODM
Utilities
VOO
RODM
Real Estate
VOO
RODM
Basic Materials
VOO
RODM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
RODM
VOO vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 3.58 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 14.22 | -1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -35.98% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -7.10% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -10.58% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -28.85% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -35.98% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -0.31% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -6.37% | +2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.78% | +0.19% |
Volatility
VOO vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.54%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 3.54% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 8.76% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 11.02% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 13.47% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 15.21% | +2.82% |
VOO vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than RODM's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.77% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and RODM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to RODM (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs RODM's -35.98%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 9.30% for RODM. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while RODM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.29% for RODM.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer