VOO vs. MOTI
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while MOTI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 6.54%/yr for MOTI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for MOTI.
Performance
VOO vs. MOTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than MOTI's -7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed MOTI with an annualized return of 15.50%, while MOTI has yielded a comparatively lower 6.54% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
MOTI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -7.11%
- 1Y
- 0.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.64%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
VOO vs. MOTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | -7.33% | 25.01% | 1.94% | 10.18% | -6.93% | 0.03% | 7.24% | 17.63% | -13.92% | 34.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and MOTI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between VOO and MOTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. MOTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
MOTI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
MOTI
Financial Services
VOO
MOTI
Communication Services
VOO
MOTI
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
MOTI
Healthcare
VOO
MOTI
Industrials
VOO
MOTI
Consumer Defensive
VOO
MOTI
Energy
VOO
MOTI
-
Utilities
VOO
MOTI
-
Real Estate
VOO
MOTI
-
Basic Materials
VOO
MOTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. MOTI — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
MOTI
VOO vs. MOTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.02 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 0.06 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 0.16 | +12.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. MOTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum MOTI drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and MOTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -36.70% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -15.45% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -16.35% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -30.83% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -36.70% | +2.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -12.76% | +10.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -9.14% | +5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 6.09% | -4.12% |
Volatility
VOO vs. MOTI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) at 3.50%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 3.50% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 11.05% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 14.40% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 17.55% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 18.04% | -0.01% |
VOO vs. MOTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTI's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. MOTI - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than MOTI's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.48% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and MOTI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to MOTI (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs MOTI's -36.70%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 6.54% for MOTI. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.
MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while MOTI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.57% for MOTI.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and MOTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer