PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VOO vs. IWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VOO vs. IWV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for IWV. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWV.

Performance

VOO vs. IWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VOO having a 9.08% return and IWV slightly higher at 9.30%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOO having a 15.50% annualized return and IWV not far behind at 14.84%.

VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

IWV

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
9.30%
6M
9.38%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. IWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF		9.30%16.96%23.49%25.82%-19.28%25.54%20.55%30.66%-5.43%20.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and IWV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.99

The correlation between VOO and IWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. IWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VOO
IWV

Technology

35.7%
33.1%

Financial Services

11.6%
12.2%

Communication Services

11.3%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.5%
9.1%

Industrials

8.3%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
IWV
33.1%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
IWV
12.2%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
IWV
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
IWV
10.2%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
IWV
9.1%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
IWV
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
IWV
4.7%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
IWV
3.8%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
IWV
2.3%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
IWV
2.4%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
IWV
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

iShares Russell 3000 ETF

Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV
Often compared with IWV:
IWV vs. SPYIWV vs. VTIIWV vs. IWMIWV vs. ACWXIWV vs. VTHRIWV vs. IVVIWV vs. RSP

Return for Risk

VOO vs. IWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
IWV
IWV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. IWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VOOIWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.99
1.94

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.70
2.64

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.74

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

12.28

+0.14

VOO vs. IWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the IWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and IWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. IWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IWV drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IWV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VOOIWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-55.61%

+21.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.89%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-19.28%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-25.11%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-35.22%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-2.09%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-10.58%

+6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.98%

-0.01%

Volatility

VOO vs. IWV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VOOIWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.44%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

9.75%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

12.57%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

17.30%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.43%

-0.40%

VOO vs. IWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IWV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VOO vs. IWV - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than IWV's 0.87% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF		0.87%0.96%1.08%1.30%1.56%1.04%1.30%1.69%1.97%1.58%1.79%1.99%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.99, VOO and IWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWV has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IWV's -55.61%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 14.84% for IWV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 14.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWV.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.87% for IWV.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.20% for IWV.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and IWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer