PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. GWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 15.50%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

GWW

1D
0.15%
1M
2.47%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.19%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
24.71%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
30.92%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and GWW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and GWW has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.64

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

3.20

+9.22

VOO vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and GWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum GWW drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and GWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-56.73%

+22.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-13.92%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-24.50%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-24.50%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-41.60%

+7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-1.05%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-11.01%

+7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

7.61%

-5.64%

Volatility

VOO vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.85%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

17.85%

-8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

24.78%

-12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

24.68%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

28.52%

-10.49%

Dividends

VOO vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than GWW's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.70%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and GWW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWW has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs GWW's -56.73%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and GWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer