VOO vs. GLW
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while GLW (Corning Incorporated) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 27.57%/yr for GLW. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VOO vs. GLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 105.36% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 15.50%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 27.57% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
GLW
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -13.09%
- YTD
- 105.36%
- 6M
- 103.59%
- 1Y
- 256.47%
- 3Y*
- 79.90%
- 5Y*
- 36.42%
- 10Y*
- 27.57%
VOO vs. GLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 105.36% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and GLW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between VOO and GLW shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. GLW — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
GLW
VOO vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.60 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 11.23 | -8.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 35.65 | -23.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and GLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -99.02% | +65.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -23.01% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -27.57% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -34.52% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -48.80% | +14.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -13.83% | +11.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -50.50% | +46.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 7.23% | -5.26% |
Volatility
VOO vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 24.91%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 24.91% | -20.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 50.66% | -41.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 56.33% | -44.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 35.81% | -18.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 33.86% | -15.83% |
Dividends
VOO vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than GLW's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.63% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and GLW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLW has higher volatility (24.91%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs GLW's -99.02%.
GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.58 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and GLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer