GLW vs. APH
Compare and contrast key facts about Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Amphenol Corporation (APH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLW or APH.
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and APH is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GLW vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLW:
2.68
APH:
1.76
GLW:
3.81
APH:
2.12
GLW:
1.50
APH:
1.32
GLW:
1.18
APH:
2.75
GLW:
13.41
APH:
8.63
GLW:
5.36%
APH:
5.43%
GLW:
26.77%
APH:
26.71%
GLW:
-99.02%
APH:
-63.41%
GLW:
-33.88%
APH:
-7.67%
Fundamentals
GLW:
$42.67B
APH:
$84.22B
GLW:
$0.19
APH:
$1.74
GLW:
262.32
APH:
39.90
GLW:
0.63
APH:
2.14
GLW:
$9.62B
APH:
$10.90B
GLW:
$3.03B
APH:
$3.66B
GLW:
$1.52B
APH:
$2.68B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than APH's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 10.90%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 19.00% annualized return.
GLW
4.88%
5.91%
13.92%
68.54%
14.04%
10.90%
APH
-0.04%
-0.84%
8.40%
43.44%
21.71%
19.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLW vs. APH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLW
APH
GLW vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLW vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than APH's 0.79% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 2.25% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% | 1.74% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
GLW vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and APH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLW vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Corning Incorporated (GLW) is 6.29%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that GLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLW vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities