GLW vs. APH
Compare and contrast key facts about Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Amphenol Corporation (APH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLW or APH.
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and APH is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GLW vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLW:
0.72
APH:
0.10
GLW:
1.15
APH:
0.35
GLW:
1.16
APH:
1.05
GLW:
0.39
APH:
0.14
GLW:
3.27
APH:
0.39
GLW:
7.08%
APH:
8.71%
GLW:
32.31%
APH:
34.55%
GLW:
-99.02%
APH:
-63.42%
GLW:
-47.87%
APH:
-24.58%
Fundamentals
GLW:
$33.47B
APH:
$71.56B
GLW:
$0.58
APH:
$1.92
GLW:
67.36
APH:
30.78
GLW:
0.42
APH:
2.23
GLW:
$10.14B
APH:
$11.97B
GLW:
$3.27B
APH:
$4.05B
GLW:
$1.70B
APH:
$2.99B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a -17.31% return, which is significantly lower than APH's -14.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 8.74%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 15.99% annualized return.
GLW
-17.31%
-14.94%
-11.92%
23.23%
18.20%
8.74%
APH
-14.70%
-5.86%
-4.85%
1.59%
26.91%
15.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLW vs. APH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLW
APH
GLW vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLW vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than APH's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 2.87% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% | 1.74% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 1.02% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
GLW vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and APH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLW vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Amphenol Corporation (APH) have volatilities of 14.55% and 14.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLW vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities