GLW vs. CSCO
Compare and contrast key facts about Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLW or CSCO.
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and CSCO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GLW vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLW:
0.79
CSCO:
0.80
GLW:
1.24
CSCO:
1.18
GLW:
1.18
CSCO:
1.17
GLW:
0.43
CSCO:
0.69
GLW:
3.52
CSCO:
3.77
GLW:
7.27%
CSCO:
4.37%
GLW:
32.39%
CSCO:
20.57%
GLW:
-99.02%
CSCO:
-89.26%
GLW:
-47.15%
CSCO:
-15.56%
Fundamentals
GLW:
$33.94B
CSCO:
$216.46B
GLW:
$0.58
CSCO:
$2.28
GLW:
68.29
CSCO:
23.86
GLW:
0.39
CSCO:
2.54
GLW:
$10.14B
CSCO:
$54.18B
GLW:
$3.27B
CSCO:
$35.11B
GLW:
$1.70B
CSCO:
$14.62B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a -16.17% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's -6.85% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has underperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 8.81%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.
GLW
-16.17%
-13.76%
-9.14%
24.94%
17.47%
8.81%
CSCO
-6.85%
-14.34%
5.02%
15.44%
8.75%
10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLW vs. CSCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLW
CSCO
GLW vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLW vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than CSCO's 2.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 2.83% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% | 1.74% |
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.96% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
GLW vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than CSCO's maximum drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and CSCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLW vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison
Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a higher volatility of 14.61% compared to Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) at 9.67%. This indicates that GLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLW vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities