PortfoliosLab logo
GLW vs. CSCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GLW and CSCO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

GLW vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.29%
29.80%
GLW
CSCO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLW:

2.13

CSCO:

1.17

Sortino Ratio

GLW:

3.17

CSCO:

1.78

Omega Ratio

GLW:

1.41

CSCO:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

GLW:

0.92

CSCO:

0.88

Martin Ratio

GLW:

10.67

CSCO:

3.40

Ulcer Index

GLW:

5.33%

CSCO:

6.18%

Daily Std Dev

GLW:

26.69%

CSCO:

17.98%

Max Drawdown

GLW:

-99.02%

CSCO:

-89.26%

Current Drawdown

GLW:

-36.68%

CSCO:

-0.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLW:

$40.87B

CSCO:

$235.78B

EPS

GLW:

$0.19

CSCO:

$2.33

PE Ratio

GLW:

251.21

CSCO:

25.41

PEG Ratio

GLW:

0.61

CSCO:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLW:

$9.62B

CSCO:

$52.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLW:

$3.03B

CSCO:

$34.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLW:

$1.52B

CSCO:

$14.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has underperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 10.41%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.


GLW

YTD

0.44%

1M

-1.61%

6M

6.29%

1Y

60.62%

5Y*

13.03%

10Y*

10.41%

CSCO

YTD

0.68%

1M

1.11%

6M

29.80%

1Y

22.36%

5Y*

7.99%

10Y*

11.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLW vs. CSCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLW is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLW is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLW is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLW is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLW is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLW is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CSCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSCO is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSCO is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSCO is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSCO is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSCO is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSCO is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLW vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLW, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.131.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLW, currently valued at 3.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.171.78
The chart of Omega ratio for GLW, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLW, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.920.88
The chart of Martin ratio for GLW, currently valued at 10.67, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0010.673.40
GLW
CSCO

The current GLW Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the CSCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLW and CSCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.13
1.17
GLW
CSCO

Dividends

GLW vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than CSCO's 2.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLW
Corning Incorporated
2.35%2.36%3.68%3.38%2.58%2.44%2.75%2.38%1.94%2.22%2.63%1.74%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.70%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%2.66%

Drawdowns

GLW vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than CSCO's maximum drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and CSCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-36.68%
-0.69%
GLW
CSCO

Volatility

GLW vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison

Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) at 3.66%. This indicates that GLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.88%
3.66%
GLW
CSCO

Financials

GLW vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items