GLW vs. IBM
Compare and contrast key facts about Corning Incorporated (GLW) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLW or IBM.
Key characteristics
| GLW | IBM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.21% | 1.62% |
| 1Y Return | 9.88% | 39.59% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.34% | 11.12% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.06% | 9.37% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.66% | 3.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.33 | 1.83 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.69% | 20.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.02% | -69.40% |
| Current Drawdown | -56.36% | -16.73% |
Fundamentals
| GLW | IBM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.80B | $153.22B |
| EPS | $0.68 | $8.82 |
| PE Ratio | 46.07 | 18.95 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.12 | 4.20 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.59B | $62.07B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.84B | $32.69B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.69B | $14.26B |
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and IBM is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GLW vs. IBM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 7.66%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLW vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLW vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than IBM's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 3.34% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% | 1.74% | 2.19% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 4.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.79% | 5.46% | 3.84% | 3.31% | 3.63% | 2.65% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
GLW vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and IBM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLW vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Corning Incorporated (GLW) is 6.78%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that GLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLW vs. IBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities