GLW vs. IBM
Compare and contrast key facts about Corning Incorporated (GLW) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM).
Performance
GLW vs. IBM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLW vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 55.58% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -17.70% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
Fundamentals
GLW:
$116.93B
IBM:
$230.85B
GLW:
$1.85
IBM:
$11.16
GLW:
73.44
IBM:
21.72
GLW:
1.78
IBM:
0.26
GLW:
7.50
IBM:
3.41
GLW:
9.90
IBM:
7.07
GLW:
$15.63B
IBM:
$67.54B
GLW:
$5.62B
IBM:
$39.53B
GLW:
$3.28B
IBM:
$16.95B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 55.58% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -17.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 23.82%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.
GLW
- 1D
- 5.77%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- 55.58%
- 6M
- 66.63%
- 1Y
- 201.48%
- 3Y*
- 60.85%
- 5Y*
- 28.70%
- 10Y*
- 23.82%
IBM
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- -17.70%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- -0.10%
- 3Y*
- 27.02%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLW vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank
GLW
IBM
GLW vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLW | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.28 | -0.00 | +4.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.19 | 0.22 | +3.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.03 | +0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.73 | 0.06 | +8.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.06 | 0.17 | +29.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLW | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28 | -0.00 | +4.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.74 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.38 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.29 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and IBM is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLW vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than IBM's 2.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.82% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.77% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Drawdowns
GLW vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and IBM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLW | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.02% | -69.40% | -29.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.01% | -28.69% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -28.69% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.80% | -40.59% | -8.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.09% | -22.61% | +7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -20.11% | -30.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 10.44% | -3.76% |
Volatility
GLW vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison
Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a higher volatility of 23.43% compared to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) at 8.93%. This indicates that GLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLW | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.43% | 8.93% | +14.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.10% | 27.13% | +12.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.36% | 33.70% | +13.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.32% | 24.97% | +7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 25.49% | +6.63% |
Financials
GLW vs. IBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLW vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 11.93B and revenue of 19.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 672.00M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 3.06B and revenue of 19.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 540.00M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 5.60B and revenue of 19.69B, resulting in a net margin of 28.5%.