GLW vs. IBM
Compare and contrast key facts about Corning Incorporated (GLW) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLW or IBM.
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and IBM is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GLW vs. IBM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLW:
1.07
IBM:
2.07
GLW:
1.68
IBM:
2.81
GLW:
1.24
IBM:
1.41
GLW:
0.68
IBM:
3.39
GLW:
4.07
IBM:
10.39
GLW:
9.39%
IBM:
5.39%
GLW:
34.08%
IBM:
27.46%
GLW:
-99.02%
IBM:
-69.40%
GLW:
-39.89%
IBM:
-4.00%
Fundamentals
GLW:
$38.76B
IBM:
$228.21B
GLW:
$0.52
IBM:
$5.84
GLW:
87.33
IBM:
42.05
GLW:
0.45
IBM:
1.72
GLW:
2.85
IBM:
3.69
GLW:
3.64
IBM:
8.49
GLW:
$13.60B
IBM:
$62.83B
GLW:
$4.48B
IBM:
$35.84B
GLW:
$2.34B
IBM:
$12.33B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly lower than IBM's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 10.78%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.
GLW
-4.65%
14.98%
-5.47%
36.27%
19.33%
10.78%
IBM
16.38%
14.98%
20.66%
54.61%
21.86%
9.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLW vs. IBM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLW
IBM
GLW vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLW vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than IBM's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 2.49% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% | 1.74% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 3.29% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
GLW vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and IBM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLW vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Corning Incorporated (GLW) is 7.20%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that GLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GLW vs. IBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLW vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 3.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.03B and revenue of 14.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 3.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.77B and revenue of 14.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 157.00M and revenue of 3.45B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.06B and revenue of 14.54B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.