PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. EFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 9.98% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed EFV with an annualized return of 15.65%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%

EFV

1D
0.36%
1M
1.53%
YTD
9.98%
6M
14.03%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
22.31%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.98%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and EFV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.76

The correlation between VOO and EFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOO vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
EFV

Technology

35.7%
4.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
36.9%

Communication Services

11.3%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
4.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.2%

Industrials

8.3%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
8.3%

Energy

3.5%
7.0%

Utilities

2.4%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
7.5%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
EFV
4.3%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
EFV
36.9%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
EFV
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
EFV
4.8%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
EFV
7.2%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
EFV
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
EFV
8.3%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
EFV
7.0%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
EFV
5.9%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
EFV
2.5%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
EFV
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOEFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.96

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

2.71

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.66

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.95

9.95

+5.99

VOO vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOEFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.96

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.78

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.55

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.27

+0.62

Drawdowns

VOO vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and EFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOEFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-63.94%

+29.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-10.90%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-13.72%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-25.84%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-43.16%

+9.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.75%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-14.83%

+11.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.91%

-1.00%

Volatility

VOO vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 2.74%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOEFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

4.72%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

11.53%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

14.21%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

15.96%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

17.86%

+0.15%

VOO vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EFV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EFV's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.78%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and EFV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFV has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs EFV's -63.94%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 9.83% for EFV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.39% for EFV.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and EFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer