VOO vs. EFA
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while EFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for EFA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EFA.
Performance
VOO vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VOO having a 9.08% return and EFA slightly higher at 9.36%. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 15.50%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
EFA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
VOO vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.36% | 31.55% | 3.49% | 18.36% | -14.39% | 11.45% | 7.60% | 22.04% | -13.82% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and EFA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VOO and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. EFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
EFA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
EFA
Financial Services
VOO
EFA
Communication Services
VOO
EFA
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
EFA
Healthcare
VOO
EFA
Industrials
VOO
EFA
Consumer Defensive
VOO
EFA
Energy
VOO
EFA
Utilities
VOO
EFA
Real Estate
VOO
EFA
Basic Materials
VOO
EFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
EFA
VOO vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.79 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 6.67 | +5.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and EFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -61.04% | +27.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -11.42% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -14.05% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -29.53% | +5.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -34.19% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -0.61% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -11.92% | +8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.07% | -1.10% |
Volatility
VOO vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.50% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 13.19% | -3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 15.64% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.58% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.27% | +0.76% |
VOO vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than EFA's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.09% | 3.38% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and EFA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFA has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs EFA's -61.04%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 9.84% for EFA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.
EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while EFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.32% for EFA.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and EFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer