VOO vs. DBJP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.23%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for DBJP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.

Performance

VOO vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 16.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOO having a 15.23% annualized return and DBJP not far ahead at 15.87%.

VOO

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.18%
• 1Y: 25.87%
• 3Y*: 21.52%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 15.23%

DBJP

• 1D: -3.50%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 16.67%
• 6M: 18.37%
• 1Y: 49.57%
• 3Y*: 26.98%
• 5Y*: 20.66%
• 10Y*: 15.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.45%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	16.67%	29.51%	25.53%	36.21%	-4.19%	13.04%	10.53%	20.87%	-14.82%	21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and DBJP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011	0.63

The correlation between VOO and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOO	DBJP
Technology	35.7%	19.1%
Financial Services	11.6%	17.5%
Communication Services	11.3%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	12.2%
Healthcare	8.5%	6.3%
Industrials	8.3%	26.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.6%
Energy	3.5%	1.1%
Utilities	2.4%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	3.0%

Return for Risk

VOO vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 66
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VOO	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.62	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	3.56	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.47	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	4.79	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	18.63	-5.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VOO vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VOO	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.62	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	1.09	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.82	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.67	+0.21

Drawdowns

VOO vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and DBJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOO	DBJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-31.30%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-10.39%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-21.50%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-21.50%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	-31.30%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-3.50%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-7.29%	+3.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.67%	-0.75%

Volatility

VOO vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOO	DBJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	4.97%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	14.27%	-4.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	19.02%	-6.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	18.99%	-2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	19.48%	-1.46%

VOO vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOO vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DBJP's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	2.41%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOO and DBJP in my portfolio?

VOO and DBJP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOO or DBJP?

DBJP has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to VOO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

Which ETF is better, VOO or DBJP?

On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 15.87% vs 15.23% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOO or DBJP?

Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 15.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOO or DBJP?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOO or DBJP?

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

What is the main difference between VOO and DBJP?

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while DBJP is Japan Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.45% for DBJP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.