PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. VSS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. VSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than VSS's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VONV has outperformed VSS with an annualized return of 11.51%, while VSS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.


VONV

1D
-1.12%
1M
3.59%
YTD
15.09%
6M
16.02%
1Y
29.50%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.51%

VSS

1D
-0.84%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.92%
1Y
25.39%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. VSS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
15.09%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
10.11%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and VSS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.76

The correlation between VONV and VSS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONV vs. VSS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
VSS

Financial Services

18.9%
14.2%

Technology

14.9%
13.9%

Industrials

13.1%
19.9%

Healthcare

10.9%
4.3%

Communication Services

8.5%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
2.7%

Energy

7.0%
8.4%

Utilities

4.4%
3.6%

Real Estate

4.1%
7.2%

Basic Materials

3.8%
16.0%

Financial Services

VONV
18.9%
VSS
14.2%

Technology

VONV
14.9%
VSS
13.9%

Industrials

VONV
13.1%
VSS
19.9%

Healthcare

VONV
10.9%
VSS
4.3%

Communication Services

VONV
8.5%
VSS
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
7.3%
VSS
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
7.2%
VSS
2.7%

Energy

VONV
7.0%
VSS
8.4%

Utilities

VONV
4.4%
VSS
3.6%

Real Estate

VONV
4.1%
VSS
7.2%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.8%
VSS
16.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. VSS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. VSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONVVSSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.30

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

2.20

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.10

8.22

+9.88

VONV vs. VSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the VSS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and VSS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONV vs. VSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VSS drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VSS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVVSSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-43.51%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-11.62%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-15.73%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-33.93%

+15.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-43.51%

+5.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-2.99%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-9.63%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

3.10%

-1.47%

Volatility

VONV vs. VSS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) is 3.98%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that VONV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVVSSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

6.34%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

13.63%

-4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

15.62%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

16.61%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

17.30%

-0.04%

VONV vs. VSS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VSS's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. VSS - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than VSS's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.62%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.08%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONV and VSS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSS has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to VONV (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VSS's -43.51%.

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.51% vs 8.40% for VSS. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.51% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VSS.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.62% for VONV.

VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VSS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.07% for VSS.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and VSS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer