VONG vs. VIG
VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONG returned 18.77%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
VONG vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 18.77%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.25% annualized return.
VONG
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
VONG vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 8.61% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.77% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and VIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VONG and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VONG vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONG
VIG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
VONG
VIG
Communication Services
VONG
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
VONG
VIG
Healthcare
VONG
VIG
Industrials
VONG
VIG
Financial Services
VONG
VIG
Consumer Defensive
VONG
VIG
Real Estate
VONG
VIG
-
Energy
VONG
VIG
Basic Materials
VONG
VIG
Utilities
VONG
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONG vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
VONG
VIG
VONG vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.07 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 3.01 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 2.67 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 10.82 | -4.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.07 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.76 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.83 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.60 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
VONG vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -46.81% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -7.91% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -14.95% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -20.39% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -31.72% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | 0.00% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -5.52% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 1.96% | +2.87% |
Volatility
VONG vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.32%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 2.32% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 7.64% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 10.01% | +5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 14.23% | +7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 16.05% | +4.82% |
VONG vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONG vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than VIG's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONG and VIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONG has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to VIG (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.77% vs 13.25% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.
VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VIG is Dividend. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONG and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer