PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 18.77%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.25% annualized return.


VONG

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.89%
YTD
8.61%
6M
7.89%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
18.77%

VIG

1D
0.76%
1M
3.28%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.94%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
8.61%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.77%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and VIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.82

The correlation between VONG and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VONG vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
VIG

Technology

51.4%
26.2%

Communication Services

13.2%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

7.1%
16.5%

Industrials

5.7%
11.8%

Financial Services

5.3%
20.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
10.1%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Energy

0.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

0.3%
3.5%

Utilities

0.3%
3.2%

Technology

VONG
51.4%
VIG
26.2%

Communication Services

VONG
13.2%
VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
13.2%
VIG
4.7%

Healthcare

VONG
7.1%
VIG
16.5%

Industrials

VONG
5.7%
VIG
11.8%

Financial Services

VONG
5.3%
VIG
20.6%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.7%
VIG
10.1%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
VIG

-

Energy

VONG
0.4%
VIG
3.5%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
VIG
3.5%

Utilities

VONG
0.3%
VIG
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONGVIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.07

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

3.01

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.67

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.02

10.82

-4.80

VONG vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONGVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.07

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.76

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.83

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.60

+0.31

Drawdowns

VONG vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-46.81%

+14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-7.91%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-14.95%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-20.39%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-31.72%

-1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-5.52%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

1.96%

+2.87%

Volatility

VONG vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.32%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.32%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

7.64%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

10.01%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

14.23%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

16.05%

+4.82%

VONG vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONG vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than VIG's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.46%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.42%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONG and VIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONG has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to VIG (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.77% vs 13.25% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.

VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VIG is Dividend. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.04% for VIG.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer