PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 5.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VONG having a 18.58% annualized return and VUG not far behind at 18.28%.


VONG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
3.18%
6M
2.49%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
18.58%

VUG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.17%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
18.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
3.18%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.76%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and VUG is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.98

The correlation between VONG and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
VUG

Technology

54.1%
53.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
12.2%

Communication Services

12.0%
17.3%

Healthcare

6.9%
4.6%

Industrials

4.9%
3.6%

Financial Services

4.8%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
1.5%

Utilities

1.0%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.0%

Energy

0.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.6%

Technology

VONG
54.1%
VUG
53.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
12.5%
VUG
12.2%

Communication Services

VONG
12.0%
VUG
17.3%

Healthcare

VONG
6.9%
VUG
4.6%

Industrials

VONG
4.9%
VUG
3.6%

Financial Services

VONG
4.8%
VUG
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.5%
VUG
1.5%

Utilities

VONG
1.0%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
VUG
1.0%

Energy

VONG
0.4%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
VUG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONGVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

4.99

-0.69

VONG vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONG vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-50.68%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-16.53%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-22.85%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-35.61%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-35.61%

+2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-4.86%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-7.09%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

4.82%

+0.13%

Volatility

VONG vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is 5.86%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that VONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

6.55%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

13.32%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

16.80%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

22.36%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

21.53%

-0.59%

VONG vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONG vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.46%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VONG and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VUG has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to VONG (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.58% vs 18.28% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.58% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer