VONG vs. ROUS
VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONG returned 18.77%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for ROUS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
VONG vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.53% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 18.77%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.01% annualized return.
VONG
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 17.04%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
VONG vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 8.61% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.53% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and ROUS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between VONG and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VONG vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONG
ROUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
VONG
ROUS
Communication Services
VONG
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
VONG
ROUS
Healthcare
VONG
ROUS
Industrials
VONG
ROUS
Financial Services
VONG
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
VONG
ROUS
Real Estate
VONG
ROUS
Energy
VONG
ROUS
Basic Materials
VONG
ROUS
Utilities
VONG
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONG vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
VONG
ROUS
VONG vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONG | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.67 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 3.76 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 5.12 | -3.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 21.11 | -15.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONG | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.67 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.91 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.77 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.67 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
VONG vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONG | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -35.51% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -5.97% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -15.81% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -18.91% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -35.51% | +2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | 0.00% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -4.24% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 1.45% | +3.38% |
Volatility
VONG vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.61%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONG | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 2.61% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 8.54% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 11.37% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 14.38% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 16.96% | +3.91% |
VONG vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONG vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONG and ROUS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONG has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to ROUS (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.77% vs 13.01% for ROUS. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.
VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONG and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer