PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than PBUS's 10.82% return.


VONG

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.52%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
18.61%

PBUS

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.17%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%8.66%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.82%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and PBUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.85

The correlation between VONG and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
PBUS

Technology

51.4%
35.4%

Communication Services

13.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

7.1%
8.6%

Industrials

5.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

5.3%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.9%

Energy

0.4%
3.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.8%

Utilities

0.3%
2.3%

Technology

VONG
51.4%
PBUS
35.4%

Communication Services

VONG
13.2%
PBUS
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
13.2%
PBUS
10.1%

Healthcare

VONG
7.1%
PBUS
8.6%

Industrials

VONG
5.7%
PBUS
8.6%

Financial Services

VONG
5.3%
PBUS
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.7%
PBUS
4.8%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
PBUS
1.9%

Energy

VONG
0.4%
PBUS
3.6%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
PBUS
1.8%

Utilities

VONG
0.3%
PBUS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONGPBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.08

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

13.93

-8.60

VONG vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONGPBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.30

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.80

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.80

+0.10

Drawdowns

VONG vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, roughly equal to the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and PBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-33.15%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-9.02%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-19.07%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-25.40%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.64%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-5.13%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

1.99%

+2.84%

Volatility

VONG vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.94%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

9.13%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

12.06%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

17.05%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

19.33%

+1.54%

VONG vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONG vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
0.98%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VONG and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

On 5-year performance, VONG leads with 15.38% vs 13.48% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VONG has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.04% for PBUS.

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer