VONE vs. ITDH
VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and ITDH (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while ITDH is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares. VONE is passively managed, while ITDH is actively managed. Over the past year, VONE returned 27.69% vs 29.19% for ITDH. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for ITDH.
Performance
VONE vs. ITDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than ITDH's 12.77% return.
VONE
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
ITDH
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 12.77%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- 1Y
- 29.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONE vs. ITDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 11.05% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 12.48% |
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 12.77% | 21.75% | 16.71% | 12.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONE and ITDH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VONE and ITDH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONE vs. ITDH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONE
ITDH
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VONE
ITDH
Financial Services
VONE
ITDH
Communication Services
VONE
ITDH
Consumer Cyclical
VONE
ITDH
Industrials
VONE
ITDH
Healthcare
VONE
ITDH
Consumer Defensive
VONE
ITDH
Energy
VONE
ITDH
Utilities
VONE
ITDH
Real Estate
VONE
ITDH
Basic Materials
VONE
ITDH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONE vs. ITDH — Risk / Return Rank
VONE
ITDH
VONE vs. ITDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONE | ITDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.04 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | 13.45 | +1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONE | ITDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.30 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.76 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
VONE vs. ITDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than ITDH's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and ITDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONE | ITDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -16.25% | -18.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -9.64% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.40% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -1.58% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.18% | -0.26% |
Volatility
VONE vs. ITDH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) is 2.77%, while Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that VONE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONE | ITDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 3.76% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 10.27% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 12.75% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 14.51% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 14.51% | +3.74% |
VONE vs. ITDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ITDH's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONE vs. ITDH - Dividend Comparison
VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than ITDH's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VONE and ITDH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITDH has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to VONE (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs ITDH's -16.25%.
On 1-year performance, ITDH leads with 29.19% vs 27.69% for VONE. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITDH has performed better with a 29.19% return vs 27.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDH.
ITDH has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.99% for VONE.
VONE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ITDH is Target Retirement Date. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.11% for ITDH.
VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONE and ITDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer