PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 11.55%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


VO

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.20%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.73%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.55%

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.05%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and VTV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.89

The correlation between VO and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VO vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VO
VTV

Technology

18.6%
13.4%

Industrials

17.9%
14.0%

Financial Services

12.8%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
4.0%

Energy

8.5%
8.1%

Utilities

8.3%
5.2%

Healthcare

7.6%
14.5%

Real Estate

5.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
9.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.3%

Technology

VO
18.6%
VTV
13.4%

Industrials

VO
17.9%
VTV
14.0%

Financial Services

VO
12.8%
VTV
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VO
8.6%
VTV
4.0%

Energy

VO
8.5%
VTV
8.1%

Utilities

VO
8.3%
VTV
5.2%

Healthcare

VO
7.6%
VTV
14.5%

Real Estate

VO
5.4%
VTV
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

VO
4.8%
VTV
9.4%

Basic Materials

VO
4.2%
VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

VO
3.1%
VTV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

4.15

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

15.69

-7.19

VO vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.61

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.81

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.75

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Drawdowns

VO vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-59.27%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-6.35%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-14.52%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-17.04%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-36.78%

-2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-7.87%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.68%

+0.46%

Volatility

VO vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.52%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

7.55%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

10.11%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

13.88%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

16.67%

+2.28%

VO vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and VTV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 11.55% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VTV.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.36% for VO.

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer