PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than VTEB's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed VTEB with an annualized return of 11.77%, while VTEB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.03% annualized return.


VO

1D
0.97%
1M
3.61%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.31%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
11.77%

VTEB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
2.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.43%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.44%3.72%1.31%6.15%-7.99%1.14%5.19%7.35%1.04%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and VTEB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2015

0.05

Over the past year, VO and VTEB have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOVTEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.35

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

8.30

+0.14

VO vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VO vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than VTEB's maximum drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-17.00%

-41.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-2.71%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-5.53%

-13.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-12.64%

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-17.00%

-22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.54%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-2.32%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

0.77%

+1.39%

Volatility

VO vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) at 0.93%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

0.93%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

2.04%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

2.70%

+10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

3.90%

+13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

5.26%

+13.70%

VO vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VO and VTEB have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VTEB's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.36%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and VTEB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to VTEB (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.77% vs 2.03% for VTEB. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VTEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO and VTEB have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 1.36% for VO.

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTEB is Municipal Bonds. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while VTEB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index.

VTEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer