VO vs. SFNNX
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and SFNNX (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund) are both funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SFNNX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for SFNNX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFNNX.
Performance
VO vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 18.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VO having a 11.77% annualized return and SFNNX not far ahead at 11.97%.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
SFNNX
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 20.46%
- 1Y
- 40.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
VO vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 18.29% | 41.06% | 2.27% | 19.88% | -7.95% | 14.38% | 4.35% | 18.09% | -13.96% | 23.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and SFNNX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VO and SFNNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank
VO
SFNNX
VO vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.48 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 3.80 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 13.95 | -5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and SFNNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -59.60% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -10.63% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -13.78% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -25.66% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -40.23% | +0.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.67% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -11.95% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.89% | -0.73% |
Volatility
VO vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.31%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 6.43% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 12.71% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 15.24% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 15.73% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 17.33% | +1.63% |
VO vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VO vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SFNNX's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 4.32% | 5.11% | 3.61% | 3.26% | 2.92% | 3.81% | 2.42% | 3.69% | 3.51% | 2.70% | 3.21% | 2.92% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and SFNNX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFNNX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs SFNNX's -59.60%.
SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and SFNNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer