PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 11.44%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.


VO

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.75%
YTD
8.60%
6M
8.43%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
11.44%

SCHO

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
1.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
8.60%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.33%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and SCHO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010

-0.11

The correlation between VO and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VO vs. SCHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VO
SCHO

Technology

18.6%
1.1%

Industrials

17.9%

-

Financial Services

12.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%

-

Energy

8.5%

-

Utilities

8.3%

-

Healthcare

7.6%

-

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Communication Services

3.1%
1.1%

Technology

VO
18.6%
SCHO
1.1%

Industrials

VO
17.9%
SCHO

-

Financial Services

VO
12.8%
SCHO
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VO
8.6%
SCHO

-

Energy

VO
8.5%
SCHO

-

Utilities

VO
8.3%
SCHO

-

Healthcare

VO
7.6%
SCHO

-

Real Estate

VO
5.4%
SCHO

-

Consumer Defensive

VO
4.8%
SCHO

-

Basic Materials

VO
4.2%
SCHO

-

Communication Services

VO
3.1%
SCHO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOSCHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.51

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.01

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

17.08

-9.46

VO vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOSCHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.52

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.90

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.09

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.99

-0.49

Drawdowns

VO vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-5.69%

-53.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-0.86%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-0.98%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-5.69%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-5.69%

-33.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-0.35%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-0.61%

-7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

0.20%

+1.95%

Volatility

VO vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.44%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

0.44%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

0.93%

+8.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

1.37%

+11.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

1.98%

+15.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

1.56%

+17.40%

VO vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VO and SCHO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SCHO's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.91%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.38%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and SCHO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to SCHO (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.44% vs 1.69% for SCHO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO and SCHO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.38% for VO.

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHO is Government Bonds. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer