PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.23%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.95% annualized return.


VO

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.09%
6M
7.17%
YTD
10.92%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
11.23%
ALL TIME*
10.28%

IVV

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.63%
6M
7.87%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
14.95%
ALL TIME*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.92%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
9.40%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and IVV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.92

The correlation between VO and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VO vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VO
IVV

Industrials

19.9%
8.0%

Technology

18.2%
38.4%

Financial Services

13.1%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.3%

Utilities

8.4%
2.2%

Healthcare

7.8%
8.8%

Energy

7.4%
3.2%

Real Estate

5.1%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
10.0%

Industrials

VO
19.9%
IVV
8.0%

Technology

VO
18.2%
IVV
38.4%

Financial Services

VO
13.1%
IVV
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VO
9.0%
IVV
9.3%

Utilities

VO
8.4%
IVV
2.2%

Healthcare

VO
7.8%
IVV
8.8%

Energy

VO
7.4%
IVV
3.2%

Real Estate

VO
5.1%
IVV
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VO
4.6%
IVV
4.5%

Basic Materials

VO
3.9%
IVV
1.7%

Communication Services

VO
2.7%
IVV
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.22

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

9.59

-3.15

VO vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VO vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-55.25%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-8.89%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-18.75%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-24.53%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-33.90%

-5.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-2.06%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-10.74%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.05%

+0.11%

Volatility

VO vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 2.21%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

3.54%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

10.10%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

12.65%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

16.99%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

18.05%

+0.82%

VO vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VO and IVV have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than IVV's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.10%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.34%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and IVV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to VO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 14.95% vs 11.23% for VO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO and IVV have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.10% for IVV.

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer