VO vs. DBC
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.63%/yr vs 8.31%/yr for DBC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
VO vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 29.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 11.63%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.31% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
DBC
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 29.03%
- 6M
- 29.04%
- 1Y
- 35.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
VO vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 9.36% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 29.03% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and DBC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.34 |
The correlation between VO and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VO vs. DBC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
DBC
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
VO
DBC
-
Industrials
VO
DBC
-
Financial Services
VO
DBC
Consumer Cyclical
VO
DBC
-
Energy
VO
DBC
-
Utilities
VO
DBC
-
Healthcare
VO
DBC
-
Real Estate
VO
DBC
-
Consumer Defensive
VO
DBC
-
Basic Materials
VO
DBC
-
Communication Services
VO
DBC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
VO
DBC
VO vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 4.01 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 10.20 | -2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -76.36% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.96% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -13.82% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -27.34% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -41.71% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -25.36% | +23.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -46.20% | +38.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 3.51% | -1.35% |
Volatility
VO vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.25%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.20% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 16.07% | -6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 18.97% | -6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 19.22% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 17.82% | +1.14% |
VO vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
VO vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than DBC's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.58% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and DBC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to VO (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.63% vs 8.31% for DBC. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.63% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.37% for VO.
VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DBC is Commodities. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.85% for DBC.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer