VO vs. CTEF
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. VO is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
VO vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.
VO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VO vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.05% | 7.86% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and CTEF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
VO
CTEF
VO vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 3.54 | -3.04 |
Drawdowns
VO vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -15.00% | -43.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.41% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -1.80% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility
VO vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 21.81% | -9.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 21.81% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 21.81% | -2.86% |
VO vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VO vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and CTEF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for VO and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer