VO vs. BMVP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index while BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.55%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for BMVP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.

Performance

VO vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than BMVP's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed BMVP with an annualized return of 11.55%, while BMVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.

VO

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 6M: 9.73%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

BMVP

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	10.05%	11.62%	15.31%	16.03%	-18.73%	24.70%	18.10%	30.98%	-9.24%	19.28%
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	5.85%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and BMVP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004	0.90

The correlation between VO and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VO vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VO	BMVP
Technology	18.6%	16.4%
Industrials	17.9%	16.8%
Financial Services	12.8%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	10.6%
Energy	8.5%	5.2%
Utilities	8.3%	5.1%
Healthcare	7.6%	9.7%
Real Estate	5.4%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	5.1%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.6%
Communication Services	3.1%	7.6%

Return for Risk

VO vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO

VO Risk / Return Rank: 43
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 25
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VO	BMVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	0.88	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	1.33	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.15	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	1.32	+0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	4.06	+4.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VO vs. BMVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the BMVP Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and BMVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VO	BMVP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	0.88	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.38	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.51	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.11	+0.39

Drawdowns

VO vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and BMVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	VO	BMVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.87%	-78.13%	+19.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-6.45%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.02%	-15.12%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.57%	-26.58%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.37%	-39.45%	+0.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-2.37%	+1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	-36.21%	+28.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.10%	+0.04%

Volatility

VO vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 2.14%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VO	BMVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	2.14%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.21%	7.19%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	9.75%	+2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	16.07%	+1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	18.81%	+0.14%

VO vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VO vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than BMVP's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	1.36%	1.52%	1.49%	1.52%	1.60%	1.12%	1.45%	1.48%	1.82%	1.35%	1.45%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VO and BMVP in my portfolio?

VO and BMVP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VO or BMVP?

VO has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to BMVP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs BMVP's -78.13%.

Which ETF is better, VO or BMVP?

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.55% vs 9.52% for BMVP. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VO or BMVP?

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VO or BMVP?

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VO or BMVP?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.36% for VO.

What is the main difference between VO and BMVP?

VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.29% for BMVP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.