PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQ vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQ vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 5.21%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


VNQ

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
7.83%
6M
6.75%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
5.21%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
7.83%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and VYM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.68

The correlation between VNQ and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNQ vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQ
VYM

Real Estate

97.3%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.5%

Communication Services

0.6%
3.5%

Technology

0.3%
17.7%

Energy

0.1%
9.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
20.5%

Industrials

0.0%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.1%

Healthcare

-

12.2%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Real Estate

VNQ
97.3%
VYM
0.0%

Basic Materials

VNQ
1.1%
VYM
3.5%

Communication Services

VNQ
0.6%
VYM
3.5%

Technology

VNQ
0.3%
VYM
17.7%

Energy

VNQ
0.1%
VYM
9.8%

Financial Services

VNQ
0.1%
VYM
20.5%

Industrials

VNQ
0.0%
VYM
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VNQ

-

VYM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

VNQ

-

VYM
8.1%

Healthcare

VNQ

-

VYM
12.2%

Utilities

VNQ

-

VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQ vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.46

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

3.93

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

14.76

-10.98

VNQ vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.56

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.83

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.73

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.51

-0.24

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-56.98%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-6.69%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-14.46%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-15.84%

-18.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

-35.21%

-7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-0.43%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-7.19%

-6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.78%

+0.86%

Volatility

VNQ vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.77%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

7.67%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

10.28%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

13.96%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

16.34%

+4.36%

VNQ vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQ vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.69%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQ and VYM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQ has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 5.21% for VNQ. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while VYM is Dividend. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer