VNQ vs. FSTA
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.65%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for FSTA. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FSTA.
Performance
VNQ vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than FSTA's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed FSTA with an annualized return of 5.65%, while FSTA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.01% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
FSTA
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
VNQ vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 12.51% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 10.62% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and FSTA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between VNQ and FSTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
FSTA
VNQ vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.78 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 1.56 | +3.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and FSTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -25.13% | -47.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -9.29% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -11.76% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -16.58% | -17.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -25.13% | -17.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.38% | +4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -3.56% | -10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 4.62% | -1.97% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 4.62% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 10.03% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 12.58% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 13.15% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 14.57% | +6.15% |
VNQ vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNQ vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than FSTA's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.15% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.54% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and FSTA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FSTA (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs FSTA's -25.13%.
On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 8.01% vs 5.65% for VNQ. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 8.01% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 2.15% for FSTA.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while FSTA is Consumer Staples Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.08% for FSTA.
VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and FSTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer