VNQ vs. ACWX
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.53%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for ACWX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWX.
Performance
VNQ vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than ACWX's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed ACWX with an annualized return of 5.53%, while ACWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
ACWX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VNQ vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.49% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 13.42% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and ACWX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.57 |
The correlation between VNQ and ACWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNQ vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
ACWX
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
VNQ
ACWX
Basic Materials
VNQ
ACWX
Communication Services
VNQ
ACWX
Technology
VNQ
ACWX
Energy
VNQ
ACWX
Financial Services
VNQ
ACWX
Industrials
VNQ
ACWX
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
ACWX
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
ACWX
Healthcare
VNQ
-
ACWX
Utilities
VNQ
-
ACWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
ACWX
VNQ vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.53 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 9.69 | -4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than ACWX's maximum drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and ACWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -60.40% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -11.42% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -13.84% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -30.07% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -35.38% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.82% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -13.32% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.98% | -0.33% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.74%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 7.03% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 14.36% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 16.43% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 16.46% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 17.43% | +3.29% |
VNQ vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNQ vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than ACWX's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.49% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and ACWX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to VNQ (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs ACWX's -60.40%.
On 10-year performance, ACWX leads with 9.87% vs 5.53% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.49% for ACWX.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while ACWX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.32% for ACWX.
ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and ACWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer