PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNOM vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VNOM vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNOM achieves a 11.65% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VNOM has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 14.86%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.26% annualized return.


VNOM

1D
0.86%
1M
-5.30%
6M
18.04%
YTD
11.65%
1Y
15.15%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
25.81%
10Y*
14.86%

EQT

1D
-2.59%
1M
-5.95%
6M
-3.84%
YTD
-8.35%
1Y
-10.68%
3Y*
7.92%
5Y*
19.22%
10Y*
2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNOM vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
11.65%-16.58%65.52%4.83%61.69%94.24%-50.69%0.66%19.60%55.99%
EQT
EQT Corporation
-8.35%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VNOM and EQT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2014

0.36

The correlation between VNOM and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VNOM:

$15.13B

EQT:

$30.55B

EPS

VNOM:

-$0.28

EQT:

$5.35

PS Ratio

VNOM:

4.37

EQT:

3.05

PB Ratio

VNOM:

1.49

EQT:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

VNOM:

$1.60B

EQT:

$10.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VNOM:

$740.00M

EQT:

$6.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

VNOM:

$1.04B

EQT:

$7.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNOM vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNOM
VNOM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VNOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VNOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNOM vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNOMEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.98

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

-0.34

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

-0.75

+3.66

VNOM vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNOM and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNOM vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNOM drawdown since its inception was -86.96%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNOM and EQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNOMEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.96%

-91.51%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-27.89%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

-31.62%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

-42.56%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.96%

-87.69%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.18%

-27.89%

+8.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-23.34%

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

12.53%

-5.78%

Volatility

VNOM vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 7.05%. This indicates that VNOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNOMEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

7.05%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.81%

21.18%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.61%

32.05%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.69%

42.44%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.16%

48.89%

-3.73%

Dividends

VNOM vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

VNOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than EQT's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.34%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
5.50%6.03%4.89%5.58%7.68%5.16%5.85%7.38%8.14%5.27%4.83%6.16%

Financials

VNOM vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Viper Energy Partners LP and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
496.00M
3.38B
(VNOM) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VNOM vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Viper Energy Partners LP and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.4%
98.4%
Portfolio components
VNOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a gross profit of 255.00M and revenue of 496.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

VNOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported an operating income of 238.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

VNOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a net income of 97.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VNOM and EQT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNOM has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to EQT (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNOM dropped -86.96% vs EQT's -91.51%.

VNOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNOM and EQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer