PortfoliosLab logo
VNOM vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VNOM and FANG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

VNOM vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VNOM:

0.32

FANG:

-0.69

Sortino Ratio

VNOM:

0.60

FANG:

-0.85

Omega Ratio

VNOM:

1.08

FANG:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

VNOM:

0.28

FANG:

-0.68

Martin Ratio

VNOM:

0.67

FANG:

-1.46

Ulcer Index

VNOM:

14.18%

FANG:

19.72%

Daily Std Dev

VNOM:

37.64%

FANG:

39.13%

Max Drawdown

VNOM:

-86.96%

FANG:

-88.72%

Current Drawdown

VNOM:

-27.81%

FANG:

-33.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VNOM:

$11.45B

FANG:

$39.69B

EPS

VNOM:

$3.95

FANG:

$16.09

PE Ratio

VNOM:

10.04

FANG:

8.44

PEG Ratio

VNOM:

0.64

FANG:

1.20

PS Ratio

VNOM:

13.40

FANG:

3.23

PB Ratio

VNOM:

1.94

FANG:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

VNOM:

$898.41M

FANG:

$12.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VNOM:

$595.55M

FANG:

$6.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

VNOM:

$884.36M

FANG:

$8.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNOM achieves a -16.81% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's -15.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VNOM has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 14.55%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


VNOM

YTD

-16.81%

1M

-1.94%

6M

-27.81%

1Y

10.72%

3Y*

17.22%

5Y*

38.42%

10Y*

14.55%

FANG

YTD

-15.91%

1M

0.47%

6M

-25.65%

1Y

-27.57%

3Y*

5.09%

5Y*

31.50%

10Y*

8.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Viper Energy Partners LP

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VNOM vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VNOM is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VNOM is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VNOM is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VNOM is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VNOM is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VNOM is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VNOM vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VNOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNOM and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

VNOM vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

VNOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than FANG's 3.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
6.23%4.89%5.58%7.68%5.16%5.85%7.38%8.14%5.27%4.83%6.16%1.38%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
3.86%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VNOM vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNOM drawdown since its inception was -86.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNOM and FANG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

VNOM vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 9.35%. This indicates that VNOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

VNOM vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Viper Energy Partners LP and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
245.00M
4.03B
(VNOM) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VNOM vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Viper Energy Partners LP and Diamondback Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
65.7%
45.0%
(VNOM) Gross Margin
(FANG) Gross Margin
VNOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a gross profit of 161.00M and revenue of 245.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.7%.

FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.81B and revenue of 4.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

VNOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Viper Energy Partners LP reported an operating income of 155.00M and revenue of 245.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

VNOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a net income of 75.00M and revenue of 245.00M, resulting in a net margin of 30.6%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.