PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNIE vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNIE vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNIE achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 13.55% return.


VNIE

1D
-3.53%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.99%
1Y
-2.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICOW

1D
-3.24%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
13.55%
6M
14.06%
1Y
33.72%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNIE vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VNIE and ICOW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025

0.65

The correlation between VNIE and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNIE vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNIE
VNIE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VNIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNIE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VNIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNIE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNIE vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNIEICOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.43

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

4.26

-4.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

15.12

-15.56

VNIE vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNIE Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNIE and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNIEICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

2.42

-2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.53

-0.52

Drawdowns

VNIE vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNIE drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNIE and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNIEICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-43.49%

+30.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-8.02%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-3.85%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-7.58%

+3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

2.25%

+2.90%

Volatility

VNIE vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 5.15%. This indicates that VNIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNIEICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

5.15%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.17%

11.10%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

14.12%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

16.70%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

18.49%

-2.96%

VNIE vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNIE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNIE vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

VNIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than ICOW's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.25%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%
VNIE
Vontobel International Equity Active ETF
0.32%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNIE and ICOW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNIE has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to ICOW (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNIE dropped -13.11% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 1-year performance, ICOW leads with 33.72% vs -2.11% for VNIE. On fees, VNIE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 33.72% return vs -2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNIE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.32% for VNIE.

They also come from different issuers: Vontobel and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VNIE and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNIE and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer