VNIE vs. RODM
VNIE (Vontobel International Equity Active ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. VNIE is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. Over the past year, VNIE returned 0.25% vs 26.71% for RODM. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VNIE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
VNIE vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNIE achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 14.40% return.
VNIE
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 0.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.80%
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.73M | $3.04M | $3.79M | |
| $5.03K | $2.63K | $2.87K |
VNIE vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VNIE Vontobel International Equity Active ETF | 0.05% | -1.01% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 14.40% | 17.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNIE and RODM is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025 | 0.72 |
The correlation between VNIE and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNIE vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
VNIE
RODM
VNIE vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNIE | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.46 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.86 | -3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 15.55 | -15.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNIE vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNIE drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNIE and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNIE | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -35.98% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -7.10% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.14% | -0.53% | -7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -6.30% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 1.76% | +2.79% |
Volatility
VNIE vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.27%. This indicates that VNIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNIE | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 3.27% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 8.94% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 10.87% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 13.46% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 14.96% | +1.12% |
VNIE vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNIE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNIE vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
VNIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than RODM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
VNIE Vontobel International Equity Active ETF | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNIE and RODM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNIE has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to RODM (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNIE dropped -13.11% vs RODM's -35.98%.
On 1-year performance, RODM leads with 26.71% vs 0.25% for VNIE. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RODM has performed better with a 26.71% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VNIE.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.32% for VNIE.
They also come from different issuers: Vontobel and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VNIE and 0.29% for RODM.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNIE and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer