VMOT vs. JMOM
VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - VMOT tracks the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMOT returned 6.94%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for JMOM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
VMOT vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.
VMOT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
VMOT vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 17.28% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 4.59% | -15.64% | 4.54% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and JMOM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VMOT and JMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (5 years) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VMOT vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMOT
JMOM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
VMOT
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
VMOT
JMOM
Technology
VMOT
JMOM
Energy
VMOT
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
VMOT
JMOM
Healthcare
VMOT
JMOM
Financial Services
VMOT
JMOM
Communication Services
VMOT
JMOM
Basic Materials
VMOT
JMOM
Utilities
VMOT
JMOM
Real Estate
VMOT
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMOT vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
VMOT
JMOM
VMOT vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMOT | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.69 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | 22.24 | -8.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMOT | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.58 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.88 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.82 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, roughly equal to the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMOT | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -34.31% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -7.87% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -19.51% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | -28.26% | +4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.17% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -6.32% | -7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.66% | +0.92% |
Volatility
VMOT vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 4.62%. This indicates that VMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMOT | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.62% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 11.55% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 14.32% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 18.65% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 20.13% | -5.23% |
VMOT vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMOT vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 1.75% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMOT and JMOM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMOT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to JMOM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 6.94% for VMOT. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.
VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.
VMOT tracks Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMOT and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer